Law of International Trade Essays

Law of International Trade Essays Law of International Trade Essay Law of International Trade Essay Introduction Coffee Beans that were bought in Sao Paulo. Brazil are to be transported to a terminal based in Durham. England. The entire weight of the Coffee Beans to be shipped is 1500 metric tons. At first. this may look to be an ordinary cargo on the surface. However. when seting into perspective the sum of legalities to be fulfilled and the monolithic measure of beans involved. the dashing nature of the undertaking becomes apparent. Every state has its ain set of curious trade Torahs. These Torahs become more complex and stringent when it comes to International trade. However. while merchandising across boundaries. the local domestic jurisprudence demands to be respected at any cost. An International trade jurisprudence is a combination of the jurisprudence of the land and international Torahs regulating the minutess of goods or services across boundary lines ( Cornell. 2005 ) . Multilateral pacts are besides signed between states to decide differences and efficaciously implement reciprocally consented footings and conditions. This is done to standardise the full procedure and prevent struggles. For case. the Convention on contracts for the International Gross saless of Goods ( CISG ) is one such international trade understanding put away by the UN to regulate International trade operations. The different manners of transit available for transit demand to be considered. maintaining in head a host of factors. This includes guaranting the safe theodolite of the beans at each and every point. right from the topographic point of purchase to the finish terminal. Attempts besides need to be made to do the procedure every bit economical as possible. The decrease in transit charges would interpret to higher degrees of net income. The sharing of the costs involved in transporting the beans should be decently worked out and the determinations should be incorporated into the understanding. The point at which the seller’s liability ends besides needs to be suitably documented. It is normally indicated by the INCO footings. Although economic system in transit is indispensable. it should non come at the cost of priceless clip. The goods besides need to be transported within a sensible timeframe. The Torahs modulating trade in the going every bit good as finish points need to be decently interpreted. in order to avoid confusion at a ulterior point of clip. This calls for relevant paperwork which would attest the legitimacy of the whole procedure. To get down with. the whole procedure demands to be broken down into different stairss. The purchase of java beans can either be from a maker or a jobber. Relevant cogent evidence of purchase provided should be provided by the marketer. after having the in agreement monetary value. Other export licenses should be purchased. in order to transport them to the terminal in Durham. Then. the purchased beans are moved to a warehouse. Since the purchased goods are rather voluminous and bulky. transporting the goods through best the most cost-efficient solution. However. the goods from the seller’s premises have to be transported to a warehouse. A warehouse is normally an empty storage with equal installations for traveling goods. It is used by makers. concerns. importers. jobbers. exporters and imposts bureau to intermediately hive away goods. The marketer would hold to advise the purchaser about the estimated clip of reaching. The marketer would besides hold to supply necessary cogent evidence paperss of each phase involved in the passenger car of the goods. A host of disbursals are normally incurred during the passenger car of goods from one state to another. This includes disbursals incurred in Warehouse storage and labor. export packing. burden charges. inland cargo. terminal charges. forwarder’s fee. vas burden charges. charges upon reaching. ocean/ air cargo. strike responsibility. revenue enhancements. imposts and charges upon bringing at the finish. While transporting out International trade. the chief concern is the surety of obtaining payments within an acceptable period of clip. This concern is addressed by the construct of Documentary Credits. Documentary Credit is a system by which the purchaser instructs his bank to pay the marketer. On the footing of client trust. the bank transfers the financess to the seller’s bank history on the behalf of the purchaser. However. equal paperss in support of the concerned dealing will hold sent from the ship to the seller’s bank. After verifying these paperss. they are sent to the buyer’s bank for farther processing ( Fraud Aid. 2005 ) . In this agreement. the bank becomes the primary obligator. thereby advancing healthy International trade by extinguishing uncertainties and concerns about payment. The written direction given by the purchaser to his bank is besides normally known as missive of recognition ( L/C ) . The International Chamber of Commerce has defined some internationally recognized trading footings. These footings are otherwise referred to as INCO footings 2000. These trading footings are normally used during the abroad transit of goods. They are used to bespeak whether it is the marketer or purchaser that has to bring forth the needed paperss indispensable for transporting out trade on a planetary graduated table. The INCO footings should be followed by the named topographic point mentioned in the contract ( International Business Institute. 2000 ) . The named topographic point in this instance is Durham. England. These footings are capable of denominating the liabilities every bit good as rights of each party involved. Incoterms 2000 Ex Works’ refers to type of bringing where the full cost and hazard of transporting the goods from seller’s premises to the concluding finish is borne by the purchaser. This theoretical account is extremely good to the marketer. since there is no hazard involved. The marketer does non even have to take up the duty of lading the goods from his premises. as the lone duty will be to do goods available. The relevant bill and testimonies mentioned in the contract will besides hold to be provided by the marketer. The short term for Ex Works is EXW. Free Alongside Ship’ transfers the hazard and cost of transit when the marketer transports the goods to the quay. alongside the ship. The abbreviation for Free Alongside Ship is FAS. In Free Carrier’ . the duty of guaranting the safety of the goods ends for the marketer when the goods are handed over to the Carrier’s detention at a reciprocally agreed location. This location is referred to as the named point. In Free On Board. the marketer bears the liability until the goods are put on board the ship at the Port of cargo. The port of cargo is mentioned in the contract. From this point. the hazard transportations to the Buyer. This is normally known as FOB. In Cost A ; Freight ( CFR ) . the marketer ships the goods to the named Port of finish mentioned in the contract. by paying the cargo charges. The purchaser so takes up complete duty when the goods base on balls over the ship’s rail at the Port. The conditions of Cost Insurance A ; Freight are similar to the old 1. However. the Seller has to take the extra duty of paying the insurance premium on the buyer’s behalf. This is denoted by CIF. The marketer has to besides incur disbursals in sing all the hazards until the named finish. in the instance of Carriage A ; Insurance Paid ( CIP ) . When the marketer bears the cargo charges of the goods until they reach the reciprocally agreed location. it is mentioned as Passenger car Paid ( APT ) . Equally shortly as the goods reach the first bearer. it becomes a liability of the purchaser. In Delivery at Frontier ( DAB ) . the marketer bears the charges and liabilities until the goods enter the Frontier. When the goods reach the Customs procedure. it risk transportations to the purchaser. Delivered Duty Paid ( ADP ) is most favourable to the purchaser. since the marketer will bear all charges incurred in presenting the goods to the purchaser. Delivered Duty Unpaid is similar to ADP. with the exclusion of import responsibility and other official import charges that are borne by the purchaser. In Delivered Ex Ship ( DES ) . the duty and cost of reassigning the goods base on ballss from the marketer to the purchaser when the ship transporting the goods reaches the finish port. It will be the buyer’s duty to dispatch the goods. Delivered Ex Quay ( DEQ ) is of two types ; Duty Paid and Duty on Buyers Account. The marketer has the duty to present the goods in the quay of the finish port. Either the purchaser or the sealant takes up the duty of the paying the responsibility. harmonizing to the initial understanding. Farther considerations Many factors have to be considered when it comes to structuring a passenger car contract understanding. There are three signifiers of passenger car ; common passenger car. contract passenger car and private passenger car. Common passenger car is a type of bearer service catering to the general populace to execute common transit services. These services have to be authorized by assorted authorities regulative bureaus. The duties that are charged for the service legitimately demanded locations are held by these bureaus. Contract passenger car involves transit services to an limitless figure of stations. These bureaus besides have to acquire necessary mandate from the same bureaus. Relevant contracts dwelling of inside informations about the minimal rates and charges are filed at different allowing bureaus and. Transcripts of this contract are besides retained at the installations of the shippers every bit good as the bearers. Private passenger car offers transit services to concern endeavors. This service is for meant for makers and distributers that transport their goods in their private vehicles driven by their ain employees. It is besides normally known as shipper-carrier. The distinct needs’ proviso takes attention of separating the different passenger car types. It is really indispensable to separate between a normal contract and a passenger car contract ; failure to carry through this could ensue in several liability issues on both sides. This distinguishable needs proviso helps to separate a passenger car contract from a regular one. This proviso incorporates certain alone footings and conditions including specific demands of a shipper and the duties that need to be satisfied by the contract bearer. Some of the commonly reference distinguishable needs in a passenger car contract understanding are monetary value accommodation clauses. footings of recognition. incidental transit charges. lading transportation charges and specific bringing agendas. However. the shipper should truly consist these alone services if they are mentioned. A certain grade of rationality should be allowed while covering with passenger car contracts. First of all. one has to understand assorted transporting term in order to grok the transportation regulations better. Carrier’ is a term used to mention to the individual who marks the contract of passenger car with a shipper. It is normally the proprietor or charterer who hires a ship to transport their lading. riders or other goods. Shipper’ refers to the individual who pays money to the bearer to transport his goods ( Arnold. 2003 ) . Hence. the term shipper’ may either mention to the purchaser or the marketer of the beans. depending upon the INCO term in usage. Carrier is the company or bureau which undertakes to transport the beans from Brazil to England. The Contract of passenger car will use to understandings mentioned in the measure of ladling or any similar papers that concerns the passenger car of goods by sea. The term goods’ is used to mention to wares. ware and other articles. However. unrecorded animate beings are non included in the goods class. Goods such as brandy and gun pulverization were classified as unsafe goods. The cogency period of the Contract of passenger car starts from the clip of goods being loaded until they are unloaded from the ship. Hague A ; Hague Visby Rules Hague regulations were framed by the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law associating to Bills of Lading and Protocol of Signature. It came into consequence on 25 August 1924 in Brussels. It was an attempt to represent a minimal compulsory liability for bearers. since most of them were hedging the liability due to loss or harm of lading. Harmonizing to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) . this was a move by the International community to manufacture a just system for the shipper every bit good as the bearer. Even today. these regulations act as the foundation for bordering marine trading Torahs for a bulk of the states around the universe. Harmonizing to Hague Rules. the bearer will be apt to bear the cost of damaged or lost goods merely if the shipper is able to turn out that the shipper’s deficiency or absence of diligence. However. the bearer would non be held apt if the ship was unseaworthy. The bearer will besides lose the liability to counterbalance for the goods. when the harm is caused by a natural catastrophe termed as Act of God’ or a fire accident which is caused to due to any ground other than a mistake in the bearer vas. The bearer will besides non be apt for amendss caused due to the act of terrorists. war or and other anti-social elements like plagiarists. The bearer would non be responsible for a hold in the bringing of goods. if the hold was caused due to an exigency state of affairs like lockouts. quarantine operations or public work stoppages. The shipper would non be able to claim amendss from the bearer. even in the event of disregard of the responsibility by the employees of the ship. Therefore. this enabled the bearer to acquire away with liabilities originating as a consequence of mistakes made by the people working on board such as seamans and the carrier’s working staff. if the bearer was in a place to turn out that the ship was seaworthy and adequately and suitably manned ( Admiralty Law Guide. 2006 ) . Since this proviso lets bearers to acquire off scot-free. it has posed a serious struggle in equilibrating liabilities between the bearer and shipper. Transportation system of goods involves two chief types of contracts. They are Carriage Contract Agreement and Bill of Lading Contract. Passenger car Contract Agreements are normally signed when long cargos are involved. It serves as a go oning contract that stands for the safe bringing of goods to promised finish. It normally covers multiple cargos that are necessary to transport out a long cargo procedure. The complete cargo procedure may affect other manners of transit such as land and air cargo. However. passenger car contract can non function as a reception of ware. The Bill of Lading is issued by the bearer as a cogent evidence of having the goods and serves as reception of ware. A Bill of Lading is an understanding for a individual cargo procedure which may be a portion of a long procedure. In the practical sense. it is a list of outgos incurred towards lading goods into a vas. It is governed by all the footings and conditions mentioned in the Carriage Contract. It besides acts as certification that verifies the genuineness of the laden goods. Further. it indicates whether the received goods were in good status or non. Depending upon status of the goods and packaging. the Bill of Lading is classified as Clean or Foul Bill of Lading. It besides is farther cogent evidence of the being of a Carriage Contract ( Wikipedia. 2006 ) . However. the Bill of ladling and Carriage Contract are wholly different entities and they serve different intents. Hence. the Bill of Ladling can non be used as a Contract Carriage and frailty versa. There are three types of measure of ladling ; consecutive measure of ladling. order measure of ladling and bearer measure of cargo. In consecutive measure of ladling. the consignee can claim amendss from the consignor when the goods are non delivered on clip due to defaulting or carelessness of the consignor. This measure of ladling is non-negotiable. In order measure of ladling. the consignee can obtain bringing of goods if the consignee provides a measure and grounds demoing the consigner’s involvement to reassign. This measure of cargo is negotiable. In bearer measure of ladling. any individual keeping the measure of landing is entitled to have the goods. When the consignor does non advert the consignee’s name. it becomes a carrier measure and can be negotiated. Goods that are issued with a negotiable measure of ladling can be received merely if the original paperss are presented at the clip of bringing. However. the hurrying of trade and theodolite operations has given manner to the issue of non-negotiable paperss for goods. which enables the consignor to have the goods by merely showing the non-negotiable measure of ladling ( Forwarder Law. 2005 ) . Some of the standard duties that have to be fulfilled by the consignor include supplying the bearer with consignee’s name and reference and finish of the passenger car. The nature. weight. volume and the measure of the goods to be shipped are besides to be clearly stated. Even the wadding and wrapper manner. figure of bundles and any other inside informations needed to place the goods need to be provided by the consignor. The consigner would be held be responsible for any amendss. in the event of false or deficient inside informations being provided. Harmonizing to Article 283 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act ( CGSA ) ( 1924 ) . the Bill of Lading can be issued either in the name of a peculiar individual or the carrier. It normally consists of the following inside informations. 1 ) Date of publishing the measure. 2 ) Venue where the measure was signed and brought to consequence. 3 ) Topographic point of going and finish. 4 ) Names and references of the consigner. consignee. bearer and the passenger car committee agent. 5 ) The value and designation inside informations of the shipped points. 6 ) Date of transportation. 7 ) Freight and other disbursals with an indicant of whether they are collectible by the consigner or the consignee. 8 ) The conditions refering to the burden and unloading. type of conveyance agencies required to be used for passenger car. the path to be followed. a finding of the duty and any other particular conditions which may be included in a passenger car contract. In add-on to the measure of ladling. the bearer besides issues a non-negotiable reception called bill of lading which proves to be utile in a state of affairs when the goods arrive before the dealing paperss. It is besides issued when the consignee and the consignor is the same individual ( Evans. 2001 ) . This option can be chosen when the consignor decides to cut down paperwork. A ship’s bringing order is another papers that undertakes to transport goods by sea. The commissariats for this papers are provided by the CGSA ( 1992 ) . However. this papers can neither replace a bill of lading nor a measure of cargo. Harmonizing to Article 284 of the CGSA ( 1924 ) . the bearer would be required to publish a measure of ladling to the consignor. Alternatively. the bearer can besides give a reception adverting the inside informations of the goods carried and day of the month of cargo to the consignor. The consignor would be required to present the goods to be shipped at the carrier’s premises. The consignor should besides bring forth relevant papers deemed necessary for transporting. The consignor will be held responsible for any liability arising as a consequence of inaccurate or uncomplete information in the paperss provided. Harmonizing to Article 288 of the CGSA ( 1924 ) . Since the bearer possesses the right to analyze the packaged goods and the criterion of packing before the passenger car. the harm of goods originating due to improper packaging is non wholly borne by the consignor ; the liability is shared with the bearer. Harmonizing to Article 289 of the same Act. the initial scrutiny of the goods would necessitate the presence of the consignor. if gap of packaging is involved. If the consignor is absent during the review procedure. the scrutiny would come on and scrutiny costs would be levied from the consignor. If the bearer finds the goods to be unsuitable for theodolite. the consignor would be informed about the same. Such goods would be shipped by the bearer merely if the consignor bears the liability of harm of goods and the consigner’s consent about the same is incorporated into the Bill of Lading. Cargo Insurance compensates the shipper with losingss caused due to fire. loss of lading and harm. However. losingss that can be recovered from the bearer will non be compensated by Insurance Company. It is besides popularly known as Marine insurance. It is farther classified into Inland and Ocean Marine Insurance. Inland Marine Insurance is issued for goods that are transported without the affecting any signifier sea conveyance and Ocean Marine Insurance is meant for goods that are shipped through waterways. The three pillars of Marine Insurance are insurable involvement. utmost good religion. and insurance ( Export 911 ) . Marine Insurance is non compulsory. unless it is mentioned so in the understanding. The cogent evidence of Insurance is provided by the Insurance policy duly signed by the authorization of the Insurance Company. Generally. the insurance would cover the loss or harm of java beans under normal fortunes. However. the insurance would go nothingness when the shipper tries to or succeeds in doing knowing harm. When the loss of java beans is meager or caused as a consequence of improper packaging. the insurance would non cover the loss. Harmonizing to Article 292 of the CGSA ( 1924 ) . the bearer is obliged to go in the reciprocally agreed upon path mentioned in the understanding. However. the bearer is expected to take the shortest path if a path is non mentioned in the understanding. However. the bearer can alter class if any ineluctable state of affairs arises and the bearer would non be held apt for any loss caused to the consignor due to the late bringing of goods. provided a echt ground is established. The goods being transported by the bearer should be decently safeguarded. The costs incurred in accomplishing this aim. such as repackaging charges are entirely borne by the bearer. However. this does non connote taking extra attention of the goods being transported. For case. when animate beings are being shipped. the bearer will non be responsible for keeping the wellness of the animate being by supplying nutrient and H2O. The same status will stand good while transporting workss every bit good. However. the bearer would hold to take up such duties. if such conditions regulating the wellbeing of workss and animate being are incorporated in the understanding By and large. the bearer will hold the duty to dispatch the goods from the ship and bear the charges incurred towards it. In the event of the understanding non necessitating the bringing of the shipped point to the consignee’s installation. so the consignee would hold to have the same on a peculiar day of the month fixed by the bearer. If the consignee fails to make so. so s/he would hold to bear the charges incurred by the bearer for hive awaying the shipped point. However. the consignee has the right to analyze the contents before admiting the reception and decline the same. if the bearer is non co-operating. The following protocol towards the emancipation of the shippers came in the signifier of the Brussels protocol in 1968. It was responsible for inculcating an of import clause called the container clause’ . It enabled shippers to claim the compensation for each container specified in the Bill of Lading ( Admiralty Law. 2005 ) . As a consequence. this liability system came to be known as the Hague-Visby Rules. An extra protocol was added in 1979 to heighten and revise the regulations. However. neither of two auxiliary protocols of the Hague regulations was able to efficaciously modify the basic liability commissariats. Hamburg Rules The Hamburg regulations were enforced at the United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea held in Hamburg on 30 March 1978. The main aim was to implement a system that would portion the liabilities and duties between shipper and bearer in fairer mode. However. it was merely able to mildly travel the liabilities to the bearer. In add-on to the footings bearer. shipper. goods and ship. a term called Actual carrier’ is defined by the Hamburg regulations. It refers to a individual or an bureau to which the bearer hands over the complete or partial duty of transporting the goods. The clip period for claiming the liabilities caused by the bearer is besides specified by the Hamburg regulations. The shipper can action the bearer for any liabilities with a two twelvemonth clip period from the day of the month of bringing of the goods. This period can be extended by publishing appropriate legal declarations. However. this clip period gets reduced to 90 yearss. in the instance of a 2nd claim after the finding of fact is reached for the first claim. First of all. a written ailment has to be instituted to the bearer within the following on the job twenty-four hours. in the instance of evident harm or loss. However. in the instance of harm or loss non being apparent. the shipper would hold to register a written ailment to the bearer within 15 yearss of having the goods. In order to be in a place to claim amendss due to detain. the bearer would hold to give a compliant to the shipper within 60 yearss of the bringing. The ailment can be sent to the bearer in authorship or via telegraph. Adequate installations will besides hold provided by both parties to inspect and clear up these claims. If the shipper fails to fulfill any of the aforesaid conditions. he or she will non be able to claim amendss from the bearer. The Hamburg regulations besides specify the bounds for liability compensation. The compensation for the liabilities originating as a consequence of harm or loss can non transcend an sum more than 2. 5 units of history per kg or 835 units of history per bundle. This unit is quantified by the International Monetary Fund as a consequence of a Particular Drawing Right. If the shipper’s State is a member of the International Monetary Fund. so the units would be changed into the State’s currency on the judgement twenty-four hours. If the shipper’s State is non a member of the International Monetary Fund. the units would be converted harmonizing to the State’s local Torahs. The liabilities for hold in the bringing of goods should non be more than the entire cargo payable ; it can be up to two and a half times the cargo payable for the goods that are delayed. under the contract of passenger car. Arbitrations A ; Disputes The arbitration of these claims and general differences would usually take topographic point in a locale of the claimer’s penchant. However. the topographic point should be with in conformity to the judicial admissions mentioned. It should non be a topographic point outside the State where the defendant’s concern or abode is located. It can besides take topographic point in a State where the contract was signed or at the topographic point of lading or droping the goods. Judicial action may besides be taken against the bearer in the same topographic points mentioned above. It is better to see the java beans before they are to be shipped onboard a vas. due to the hazards involved in transit. Since the bearers have merely restricted restrictions. it does do sense to obtain insurance. Most bearers transporting from Sao Paulo to Durham. for case Xiameter’ ( 2006 ) follows Passenger car and Insurance Paid ( CIP ) bringing. Therefore. it is better to transport the java beans through a reputed bearer. in order to understate hazards and finish the transportation within a coveted period of clip. Bibliographies ACE- Baracuda. Guide to Incoterms. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. ace-baracuda. com/template7. asp? pageid=26 ( accessed at: 23 April 2006 ) Admiralty and Maritime Law Guide.International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law associating to Bills of Lading ( Hague Rules ) . and Protocol of Signature: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. admiraltylawguide. com/conven/haguerules1924. hypertext markup language ( accessed at: 23 April 2006 ) Briel. E. ( 1947 )International Passs: A treatise on International jurisprudence. Nyt Nordisk Forlag. Copenhagen. Brooks. M. ( 2000 )Sea Change in Liner Shipping: Regulation and Managerial Decision-Making in Global Industry. Pergamon imperativeness. Amsterdam. Brown. E. D. ( 1997 ) Law of Sea History. Bernhardt. R. ( Ed ) .Encyclopaedia of Public International Law.Amsterdam. Northern Holland. Brugmann. G. ( 2003 )Entree to Maritime ports. Maestro of Laws ( LLM ) . Books on Demand GmbH. Noderstedt. Germany. Caron. D. ( 1989 ) Ships. Nationality and Status. Bernhardt. R ( Ed )Encyclopaedia of Public International jurisprudence. Vol. 11. Amsterdam. Northern Holland. Lex Mercatoria: Information on United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ( UNCITRAL ) .UN Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea 1978: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. jus. uio. no/lm/un. sea. passenger car. Hamburg. regulations. 1978/doc ( accessed at: 23 April 2006 ) Mentions Admiralty Law ( 2005 )Hague-Visby Rules.Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. admiraltylaw. com/statutes/hague. hypertext markup language ( accessed at: 29 April 2006 ) . Admiralty Law Guide ( 2006 )Hague Rules.Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. admiraltylawguide. com/conven/haguerules1924. hypertext markup language ( accessed at: 28 April 2006 ) . Arnold. A ( 2003 )Relocation Terminology. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. aarnold. net/terminology. htm ( accessed at: 28 April 2006 ) . Evans. J ( 2001 )Law of International Trade.3rdEdition. Old Bailey Press. London. Cornell Law School. ( 2005 )International Trade. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. jurisprudence. Cornell. edu/wex/index. php/International_trade ( accessed at: 29 April 2006 ) . Export 911.Principles of Cargo Insurance.Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. export911. com/e911/ship/principl. htm # xInstitute ( accessed at: 30 April 2006 ) . Forwarder Law.Status of Seaway Bills.Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. forwarderlaw. com/library/view. php? article_id=237 ( accessed at: 30 April 2006 ) . Fraud Aid. ( 2005 )Documentary Credit. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. fraudaid. com/Dictionary-of-Financial-Scam-Terms/documentary_credit. htm ( accessed at: 28 April 2006 ) . International Business Institute. ( 2000 )Incoterms 2000. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. i-b-t. net/incoterms. hypertext markup language ( accessed at: 29 April 2006 ) . Administration for Economic Co-operation and Development ( OECD ) .Hague Rules of 1924.Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. oecd. org/document/41/0. 2340. en_2649_34367_2086825_1_1_1_1. 00. hypertext markup language ( accessed at: 29 April 2006 ) ( 2006 )Bill of Ladling. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Bill_of_lading ( accessed at: 28 April 2006 ) . Xiameter ( 2006 )Incoterms 2000 Descriptions.Available from: xiameter. com/content/bxrules/incoterms. pdf ( accessed at: 24 April 2006 ) .